Child as Totem: Redressing the Myth of Inherent Creativity in Early Childhood
“The idea that children see the world more clearlythan adults, with its implication that exposure toadult culture corrupts this innocent sight, is a formof mythic speech that supports the myth of inherent creativity.” – McClure (2011)
To state that children see the world more clearly than adults is a naïve and oversimplification of how children view the world. Children are not fully competent individuals, hence why we teach them certain skills, value, morals and life lessons to better themselves to become competent and well rounded adults. Nevertheless, I do believe that due to children being less conscious beings they intrinsically reveal a much more creative outlook and output of work through art than the majority of adults. 
However, I do believe that there should be some restrictions on children’s output through art. Children are a by-product of their environment. Whatever the environment that the student is encountering at home, he or she is most likely to consider it “normal”. The difficulties emerging teachers experience is the over exposure of adult content to children which is growing exponentially. The advancements in technology and lenient access to social media sites and applications are some of the reasons why I believe there is an increase in mental health issues. Cell phones and social media are equivalent to drugs and alcohol for adults. These tools affect the neurochemistry in the brain, and effect the dopamine level.
In the kindergarten program, the words creative and creativity are stated 35 and 17 times, respectively. The importance of facilitating an environment that promotes this creativity and gives students the opportunities to explore materials through problem solving strategies (How Does Learning Happen, 2014). Through the production of artistic output, a child’s work is his or her way of communicating and expressing feelings and ideas.
    Creativity does not occur in a vacuum. Art making is a process requiring both creativity and skill, and it can be cultivated by establishing conditions that encourage and promote its development. Teachers need to be aware that the atmosphere they create for learning affects the nature of the learning itself. A setting that is conducive to creativity is one in which students are not afraid to suggest alternative ideas and take risks. (The Kindergarten Program, 2016).
Needless to say, I still believe that there should be some restrictions on what the child should or should not create in terms of art. There are many types of current or generational trauma and violence that can be overwhelming chaos for students. This can include: mental health, bullying, violence, drugs, gangs, malnutrition, alcohol abuse, gun violence, poverty (low socioeconomic status) and divorce (parental partner instability) (Carpenter & Stacks, 2009; Evans & Wachs, 2010). These have negative implications for the neurological and emotional development of young children, who rely on caregivers to respond in a predictable sensitive way to their needs and provide a safe and predictable environment for them to explore.
Creativity is relatively unknown phenomena in psychology, in terms of, how creative ideas are outputted from the brain and how some individuals are not. Some people are born with creative abilities and some are not. Allowing students to have more freedom with less constraints most likely will allow them to produce creative works and ideas. However, some restrictions can promote individuals to be creative. If individuals are constrained with parameters, the individual must find a different way to solve the problem in order to complete the task. Needless to say, like anything else, there must be fine line of balance between the two.


References
Carpenter, G. L., & Stacks, A. M. (2009). Developmental effects of exposure to intimate partner
violence in early childhood: A review of the literature. Children and Youth Services Review, 31(8), 831-839.
Evans, G. W., & Wachs, T. D. (2010). Chaos and its influence on children’s        
development. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
McClure, M. (2011). Child as totem: Redressing the myth of inherent creativity in early

childhood. Studies in Art Education52(2), 129.

Ontario Ministry of Education. (2014). How Does Learning Happen? Ontario’s Pedagogy for the
Early Years. Retrieved from:  http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/childcare/howlearninghappens.pdf

Ontario Ministry of Education. (2016). The Kindergarten Program. Retrieved from Government
of Ontario: 
https://files.ontario.ca/books/edu_the_kindergarten_program_english_aoda_web_oct7.pdf

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Learning from the land: Indigenous land-based pedagogy and devolonization

Friction in Forest Pedagogies: common worlds in settler colonial spaces

Assessments