Child as Totem: Redressing
the Myth of Inherent Creativity in Early Childhood
“The
idea that children see the world more clearly
than adults, with
its implication that exposure to
adult culture
corrupts this innocent sight, is a form
of mythic speech that
supports the myth of inherent creativity.” – McClure (2011)
To state that
children see the world more clearly than adults is a naïve and
oversimplification of how children view the world. Children are not fully
competent individuals, hence why we teach them certain skills, value, morals
and life lessons to better themselves to become competent and well rounded
adults. Nevertheless, I do believe that due to children being less conscious
beings they intrinsically reveal a much more creative outlook and output of
work through art than the majority of adults.
However, I do
believe that there should be some restrictions on children’s output through
art. Children are a by-product of their environment. Whatever the environment
that the student is encountering at home, he or she is most likely to consider it
“normal”. The difficulties emerging teachers experience is the over exposure of
adult content to children which is growing exponentially. The advancements in
technology and lenient access to social media sites and applications are some
of the reasons why I believe there is an increase in mental health issues. Cell
phones and social media are equivalent to drugs and alcohol for adults. These tools
affect the neurochemistry in the brain, and effect the dopamine level.
In the
kindergarten program, the words creative and creativity are stated 35 and 17
times, respectively. The importance of facilitating an environment that
promotes this creativity and gives students the opportunities to explore
materials through problem solving strategies (How Does Learning Happen, 2014). Through the
production of artistic output, a child’s work is his or her way of
communicating and expressing feelings and ideas.
Creativity does not occur in a vacuum. Art
making is a process requiring both creativity and skill, and it can be
cultivated by establishing conditions that encourage and promote its
development. Teachers need to be aware that the atmosphere they create for
learning affects the nature of the learning itself. A setting that is conducive
to creativity is one in which students are not afraid to suggest alternative
ideas and take risks. (The Kindergarten Program,
2016).
Needless to say,
I still believe that there should be some restrictions on what the child should
or should not create in terms of art. There are many types of current or generational trauma and
violence that can be overwhelming chaos for students. This can include: mental
health, bullying, violence, drugs, gangs, malnutrition, alcohol abuse, gun
violence, poverty (low socioeconomic status) and divorce (parental partner
instability) (Carpenter
& Stacks, 2009; Evans & Wachs, 2010). These have negative implications
for the neurological and emotional development of young children, who rely on
caregivers to respond in a predictable sensitive way to their needs and provide
a safe and predictable environment for them to explore.
Creativity is relatively
unknown phenomena in psychology, in terms of, how creative ideas are outputted
from the brain and how some individuals are not. Some people are born with
creative abilities and some are not. Allowing students to have more freedom
with less constraints most likely will allow them to produce creative works and
ideas. However, some restrictions can promote individuals to be creative. If
individuals are constrained with parameters, the individual must find a
different way to solve the problem in order to complete the task. Needless to
say, like anything else, there must be fine line of balance between the two.
References
Carpenter, G. L., & Stacks, A. M. (2009). Developmental
effects of exposure to intimate partner
violence in early childhood: A
review of the literature. Children
and Youth Services Review, 31(8), 831-839.
Evans, G. W., & Wachs, T. D. (2010). Chaos and its
influence on children’s
development. Washington,
DC: American Psychological Association.
McClure,
M. (2011). Child as totem: Redressing the myth of inherent creativity in early
childhood. Studies in Art Education, 52(2),
129.
Ontario Ministry of Education. (2014). How Does
Learning Happen? Ontario’s Pedagogy for
the
Early Years. Retrieved from: http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/childcare/howlearninghappens.pdf
Ontario Ministry of Education. (2016). The Kindergarten
Program. Retrieved from Government
of Ontario:
https://files.ontario.ca/books/edu_the_kindergarten_program_english_aoda_web_oct7.pdf
Comments
Post a Comment