Pedagogical Documentation
When I first entered a
kindergarten, I was unaware how documentation and assessments were completed.
During my second and third practicum, I was introduced to anecdotal
documentation through OneNote. I noticed there was a great emphasis on taking
pictures for documentation in order to have evidence for report cards. I did
question was I fully involved in the child’s experience or was I taking too
much time taking pictures? Was I prioritizing quantity over quality? Was this just
for the parents? After some time to reflect after my practicum and with this
week’s reading, I discovered that pedagogical documentation is multifaceted and
complex.
Pedagogical documentation is
more than just about recording events – it encapsulates the learning about how
children learn and think. It offers a process to explore all of our questions
about children. Carlina Rinaldi discuses pedagogical documentation as a way of
listening, experiencing and making learning visible to others for
interpretation. Also, it encourages educators to be co-learners along with
children and their families. (How Does Learning Happen, p. 21)
One aspect that I noticed was
if, instead of pictures, would it be better to record students as
documentation. Teachers would be able to be involved or not at all in the
child’s learning experience and at the end of the day be able to analyze the
video. This would avoid teachers over emphasizing the pressure of documentation
and create quality reports of the child. Even though, this new way of
documenting students in kindergarten may increase the work load in teachers, it
be will much more genuine and thoughtful when students read their report
cards.
Dahlberg, Moss, and Pence
(2007) discuss the difference between pedagogical documentation and child
observation. They state pedagogical document as how to interpret pedagogical
work and being able to determine what the child is capable of without a predetermined
framework of norms and expectations. On the contrary, child observation is
understood as assessing the child’s psychological development and determining
what the child should be doing at that developmental age. However, I would have
to disagree with the authors. Both definitions are mutually inclusive.
Pedagogical documentation is encompassed with child observations and the notion
that imposing children under a particular framework, with expectations and
norms is a negative construct for the child’s development (Dahlberg, Moss, & Pence, 2007). In our
world today, we live under rules, expectations and notions on how individuals
should communicate, act, and present themselves in society. Simple behavioural
framework such as treating others respectfully all the way to the extremes,
such as killing another individual, are socially constructed norms that a vast
majority of people follow in Western parts of the world. Without these laws and
unwritten rules, there would be a lot more destruction, pain and suffering in
the world we live in. Hence, as human civilization grows, we become more
ethical individuals and society becomes a more comfortable place to live.
I believe I still have to
learn more information about pedagogical documentation and discover a way to
extrapolate some objectivity from their learning process and finished products.
References
Dahlberg, G., Moss, P.,
& Pence, A. (2007). Pedagogical documentation: A practice for
reflection
and democracy. In G. Dahlberg, P. Moss, & A. Pence, Beyond quality in
early childhood education and care: Languages of evaluation (3rd ed.). New
York: Routledge.
Ontario Ministry of Education. (2014). How Does
Learning Happen? Ontario’s Pedagogy for
the
Early Years. Retrieved from:
http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/childcare/howlearninghappens.pdf
Comments
Post a Comment